HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 98/1/54    most recent 00266.2007v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (22) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Tseng, Y.-w. Articles by Bastian, A. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Tseng, Y.-w. Articles by Bastian, A. J.

Sensory Prediction Errors Drive Cerebellum-Dependent Adaptation of Reaching

¹Kennedy Krieger Institute, ²Department of Neurology, and ³Department of Biomedical Engineering, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; ⁴School of Psychology, University of Wales, Bangor, Gwynedd, United Kingdom; and ⁵The Neurological Institute, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York

Submitted 8 March 2007; accepted in final form 16 May 2007

The cerebellum is an essential part of the neural network involved in adapting goal-directed arm movements. This adaptation might rely on two distinct signals: a sensory prediction error or a motor correction. Sensory prediction errors occur when an initial motor command is generated but the predicted sensory consequences do not match the observed values. In some tasks, these sensory errors are monitored and result in on-line corrective motor output as the movement progresses. Here we asked whether cerebellum-dependent adaptation of reaching relies on sensory or on-line motor corrections. Healthy controls and people with hereditary cerebellar ataxia reached during a visuomotor perturbation in two conditions: "shooting" movements without on-line corrections and "pointing" movements that allowed for on-line corrections. Sensory (i.e., visual) errors were available in both conditions. Results showed that the addition of motor corrections did not influence adaptation in control subjects, suggesting that only sensory errors were needed for learning. Cerebellar subjects were comparably impaired in both adaptation conditions relative to controls, despite abnormal and inconsistent on-line motor correction. Specifically, poor on-line motor corrections were unrelated to cerebellar subjects' adaptation deficit (i.e., adaptation did not worsen), further suggesting that only sensory prediction errors influence this process. Therefore adaptation to visuomotor perturbations depends on the cerebellum and is driven by the mismatch between predicted and actual sensory outcome of motor commands.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H. Tanaka, T. J. Sejnowski, and J. W. Krakauer Adaptation to Visuomotor Rotation Through Interaction Between Posterior Parietal and Motor Cortical Areas J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2009; 102(5): 2921 - 2932. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P.-M. Bernier, B. Burle, F. Vidal, T. Hasbroucq, and J. Blouin Direct Evidence for Cortical Suppression of Somatosensory Afferents during Visuomotor Adaptation Cereb Cortex, September 1, 2009; 19(9): 2106 - 2113. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J.-Y. Lee and N. Schweighofer Dual Adaptation Supports a Parallel Architecture of Motor Memory J. Neurosci., August 19, 2009; 29(33): 10396 - 10404. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Kaku, K. Yoshida, and Y. Iwamoto Learning Signals from the Superior Colliculus for Adaptation of Saccadic Eye Movements in the Monkey J. Neurosci., April 22, 2009; 29(16): 5266 - 5275. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Rabe, O. Livne, E. R. Gizewski, V. Aurich, A. Beck, D. Timmann, and O. Donchin Adaptation to Visuomotor Rotation and Force Field Perturbation Is Correlated to Different Brain Areas in Patients With Cerebellar Degeneration J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2009; 101(4): 1961 - 1971. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. T. Choi, E. P. G. Vining, D. S. Reisman, and A. J. Bastian Walking flexibility after hemispherectomy: split-belt treadmill adaptation and feedback control Brain, March 1, 2009; 132(3): 722 - 733. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Rabe, B. Brandauer, Y. Li, E. R. Gizewski, D. Timmann, and J. Hermsdorfer Size-Weight Illusion, Anticipation, and Adaptation of Fingertip Forces in Patients With Cerebellar Degeneration J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2009; 101(2): 569 - 579. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Fishbach and F. A. Mussa-Ivaldi Seeing versus Believing: Conflicting Immediate and Predicted Feedback Lead to Suboptimal Motor Performance J. Neurosci., December 24, 2008; 28(52): 14140 - 14146. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. W. Heuer, S. Tokiyama, and S. G. Lisberger Doing Without Learning: Stimulation of the Frontal Eye Fields and Floccular Complex Does Not Instruct Motor Learning in Smooth Pursuit Eye Movements J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2008; 100(3): 1320 - 1331. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]