HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 98/2/629    most recent 00049.2007v2 00049.2007v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Mirbagheri, M. M. Articles by Rymer, W. Z. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Mirbagheri, M. M. Articles by Rymer, W. Z.

Neuromuscular Abnormalities Associated With Spasticity of Upper Extremity Muscles in Hemiparetic Stroke

¹Department of Sensory Motor Performance Program, the Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago; and ²Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois

Submitted 14 January 2007; accepted in final form 23 May 2007

Our objective was to assess the mechanical changes associated with spasticity in elbow muscles of chronic hemiparetic stroke survivors and to compare these changes with those recorded in the ankle muscles of a similar cohort. We first characterized elbow dynamic stiffness by applying pseudorandom binary positional perturbations to the joints at different initial angles, over the entire range of motion, with subjects relaxed. We separated this stiffness into intrinsic and reflex components using a novel parallel cascade system identification technique. In addition, for controls, we studied the nonparetic limbs of stroke survivors and limbs of age-matched healthy subjects as primary and secondary controls. We found that both reflex and intrinsic stiffnesses were significantly larger in the stroke than in the nonparetic elbow muscles, and the differences increased as the elbow was extended. Reflex stiffness increased monotonically with the elbow angle in both paretic and nonparetic sides. In contrast, the modulation of intrinsic stiffness with elbow position was different in nonparetic limbs; intrinsic stiffness decreased sharply from full- to mid-flexion in both sides, then it increased continuously with the elbow extension in the paretic side. It remained invariant in the nonparetic side. Surprisingly, reflex stiffness was larger in the nonparetic than in the normal control arm, yet intrinsic stiffness was smaller in the nonparetic arm. Finally, we compare the angular dependence of paretic elbow and ankle muscles and show that the modulation of reflex stiffness with position was strikingly different.