HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 98/2/730    most recent 00457.2006v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (7) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by van der Kooij, H. Articles by de Vlugt, E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by van der Kooij, H. Articles by de Vlugt, E.

Postural Responses Evoked by Platform Pertubations Are Dominated by Continuous Feedback

¹Institute for Biomedical Technology, Department of Biomechanical Engineering, University of Twente, Enschede; and ²Biomechanical Engineering, Neuromuscular Control Laboratory, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands

Submitted 1 May 2006; accepted in final form 24 April 2007

Is human balance control dominated by time invariant continuous feedback mechanisms or do noncontinuous mechanisms play a significant role like intermittent control? The goal of this paper is to quantify how much of the postural responses evoked by pseudorandom external periodic perturbations can be explained by continuous time invariant feedback control. Nine healthy subjects participated in this study. Center of mass and ankle torque responses were elicited by periodic platform perturbations in forward-backward directions containing energy in the 0.06- to 4.5-Hz frequency band. Subjects had their eyes open (EO) or eyes closed (EC). Responses were decomposed into a periodic component and a remnant (stochastic) component using spectral analysis. It is concluded that periodic responses can explain most of the evoked responses, although the remnant power spectral densities (PSDs) were significant especially for slow responses (<0.2 Hz) and largest for EC. The found remnant PSD did depend on the sensory condition but not on the platform perturbation amplitude. The ratio of the body sway and ankle torque remnant PSD reflects the body dynamics. Both findings are consistent with the idea that estimation of body orientation is part of a continuous feedback loop and that (stochastic) estimation errors increase when one source of sensory information is removed. The findings are not consistent with the idea that discrete or discontinuous intermittent feedback mechanisms significantly shape postural responses.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. D. J. Welch and L. H. Ting A Feedback Model Explains the Differential Scaling of Human Postural Responses to Perturbation Acceleration and Velocity J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2009; 101(6): 3294 - 3309. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. D. Loram, M. Lakie, and P. J. Gawthrop Visual control of stable and unstable loads: what is the feedback delay and extent of linear time-invariant control? J. Physiol., March 15, 2009; 587(6): 1343 - 1365. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]