HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Supplemental Figure All Versions of this Article: 98/3/1806    most recent 00358.2007v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (4) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Kayser, C. Articles by Logothetis, N. K. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Kayser, C. Articles by Logothetis, N. K.

REPORT

Tuning to Sound Frequency in Auditory Field Potentials

Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tuebingen, Germany

Submitted 30 March 2007; accepted in final form 25 June 2007

Neurons in auditory cortex are selective for the frequency content of acoustical stimuli. Classically, this response selectivity is studied at the single-neuron level. However, current research often employs functional imaging techniques to investigate the organization of auditory cortex. The signals underlying the imaging data arise from neural mass action and reflect the properties of populations of neurons. For example, the signal used for functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI-BOLD) was shown to correlate with the oscillatory activity quantified by local field potentials (LFPs). This raises the questions of how the frequency selectivity in neuronal population signals compares with the tuning of spiking responses. To address this, we quantified tuning properties of auditory-evoked potentials (AEP), different frequency bands of the LFP, analog multi-unit (AMUA), and spike-sorted single- and multiunit activity in auditory cortex. The AMUA showed a close correspondence in frequency tuning to the spike-sorted activity. In contrast, for the LFP, we found a clear dissociation of high- and low-frequency bands: there was a gradual increase of tuning-curve similarity, tuning specificity, and information about the stimulus with increasing LFP frequency. Although properties of the high-frequency LFP matched those of spiking activity, the lower-frequency bands differed considerably as did the AEP. These results demonstrate that electrophysiological population responses exhibit varying degrees of frequency tuning and suggest that those functional imaging methods that are related to high-frequency oscillatory activity should well reflect the neuronal processing of sound frequency.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				F. A. Khawaja, J. M. G. Tsui, and C. C. Pack Pattern Motion Selectivity of Spiking Outputs and Local Field Potentials in Macaque Visual Cortex J. Neurosci., October 28, 2009; 29(43): 13702 - 13709. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. D. Dahl, N. K. Logothetis, and C. Kayser Spatial Organization of Multisensory Responses in Temporal Association Cortex J. Neurosci., September 23, 2009; 29(38): 11924 - 11932. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Remedios, N. K. Logothetis, and C. Kayser An Auditory Region in the Primate Insular Cortex Responding Preferentially to Vocal Communication Sounds J. Neurosci., January 28, 2009; 29(4): 1034 - 1045. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]