JN Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 98: 1810-1814, 2007. First published July 5, 2007; doi:10.1152/jn.00562.2007
0022-3077/07 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
98/3/1810    most recent
00562.2007v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zehr, E. P.
Right arrow Articles by Phadke, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zehr, E. P.
Right arrow Articles by Phadke, C.

REPORT

Enhancement of Arm and Leg Locomotor Coupling With Augmented Cutaneous Feedback From the Hand

E. Paul Zehr1,2,3, Marc Klimstra1, Katie Dragert1, Yasaman Barzi1, Mark G. Bowden5, Bahar Javan1 and Chetan Phadke4

1Rehabilitation Neuroscience Laboratory and 2Centre for Biomedical Research, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia and 3Human Discovery Science, International Collaboration on Repair Discoveries, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; 4Departments of Physical Therapy and Neuroscience, University of Florida, Gainesville and 5Brain Rehabilitation Research Center, Rehabilitation Research and Development Service, Malcom Randall Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Gainesville, Florida

Submitted 20 May 2007; accepted in final form 24 June 2007

Cutaneous feedback from the hand could assist with coordination between the arms and legs during locomotion. Previously we used a reduced walking model of combined arm and leg (ARM&LEG) cycling to examine the separate effects of rhythmic arm (ARM) and leg (LEG) movement. Here we use this same paradigm to test the modulation H-reflexes with and without interlimb cutaneous conditioning evoked by stimulating a nerve innervating the hand (superficial radial, SR). It was hypothesized that both ARM and LEG would contribute significantly to suppression of H-reflex amplitude during ARM&LEG. We also predicted a conservation of interlimb cutaneous conditioning during movement and an interaction between arm and leg rhythmic movement control. Subjects were seated in a recumbent ARM&LEG cycle ergometer and maintained a low-level soleus contraction for all tasks. H-reflex amplitude was facilitated by cutaneous conditioning evoked by stimulation of the SR nerve. H-reflex amplitudes were taken from recruitment curves and included modulation of 50% Hmax and Hmax. The suppressive effect of ARM was less than that for LEG and ARM&LEG, while suppression during LEG and ARM&LEG were generally equivalent. For H-reflexes conditioned by cutaneous input, amplitudes during ARM&LEG instead were in between those for ARM and LEG modulation. Multiple regression analysis revealed a significant contribution for ARM only in trials when SR stimulation was used to condition H-reflex amplitudes. We suggest that there is a measurable interaction between neural activity regulating arm and leg movement during locomotion that is specifically enhanced when cutaneous input from the hand is present.


Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: E. P. Zehr, Rehabilitation Neuroscience Laboratory, PO Box 3010 STN CSC, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC V8W 3P1, Canada (E-mail: pzehr{at}uvic.ca)







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2007 by the The American Physiological Society.