HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 99/1/166    most recent 00734.2007v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (10) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Lebedev, M. A. Articles by Nicolelis, M. A. L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Lebedev, M. A. Articles by Nicolelis, M. A. L.

Decoding of Temporal Intervals From Cortical Ensemble Activity

¹Departments of Neurobiology, ²Biomedical Engineering, ³Psychological and Brain Sciences and ⁴Center for Neuroengineering, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina

Submitted 29 June 2007; accepted in final form 11 November 2007

Neurophysiological, neuroimaging, and lesion studies point to a highly distributed processing of temporal information by cortico-basal ganglia-thalamic networks. However, there are virtually no experimental data on the encoding of behavioral time by simultaneously recorded cortical ensembles. We predicted temporal intervals from the activity of hundreds of neurons recorded in motor and premotor cortex as rhesus monkeys performed self-timed hand movements. During the delay periods, when animals had to estimate temporal intervals and prepare hand movements, neuronal ensemble activity encoded both the time that elapsed from the previous hand movement and the time until the onset of the next. The neurons that were most informative of these temporal intervals increased or decreased their rates throughout the delay until reaching a threshold value, at which point a movement was initiated. Variability in the self-timed delays was explainable by the variability of neuronal rates, but not of the threshold. In addition to predicting temporal intervals, the same neuronal ensemble activity was informative for generating predictions that dissociated the delay periods of the task from the movement periods. Left hemispheric areas were the best source of predictions in one bilaterally implanted monkey overtrained to perform the task with the right hand. However, after that monkey learned to perform the task with the left hand, its left hemisphere continued and the right hemisphere started contributing to the prediction. We suggest that decoding of temporal intervals from bilaterally recorded cortical ensembles could improve the performance of neural prostheses for restoration of motor function.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. J. Hwang and R. A. Andersen Brain Control of Movement Execution Onset Using Local Field Potentials in Posterior Parietal Cortex J. Neurosci., November 11, 2009; 29(45): 14363 - 14370. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Cisek, G. A. Puskas, and S. El-Murr Decisions in Changing Conditions: The Urgency-Gating Model J. Neurosci., September 16, 2009; 29(37): 11560 - 11571. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. V. Buhusi and W. H. Meck Relative time sharing: new findings and an extension of the resource allocation model of temporal processing Phil Trans R Soc B, July 12, 2009; 364(1525): 1875 - 1885. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Wittmann The inner experience of time Phil Trans R Soc B, July 12, 2009; 364(1525): 1955 - 1967. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]