HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 99/2/853    most recent 01038.2007v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Haque, A. Articles by Dickman, J. D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Haque, A. Articles by Dickman, J. D.

Recovery of Gaze Stability During Vestibular Regeneration

¹Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri; and ²School of Medicine, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi

Submitted 18 September 2007; accepted in final form 26 November 2007

Many motion related behaviors, such as gaze stabilization, balance, orientation, and navigation largely depend on a properly functioning vestibular system. After vestibular insult, many of these responses are compromised but can return during the regeneration of vestibular receptors and afferents as is known to occur in birds, reptiles, and amphibians. Here we characterize gaze stability in pigeons to rotational motion during regeneration after complete bilateral vestibular loss via an ototoxic antibiotic. Immediate postlesion effects included severe head oscillations, postural ataxia, and total lack of gaze control. We found that these abnormal behaviors gradually subsided, and gaze stability slowly returned to normal function according to a temporal sequence that lasted several months. We also found that the dynamic recovery of gaze function during regeneration was not homogeneous for all types of motion. Instead high-frequency motion stability was first achieved, followed much later by slow movement stability. In addition, we found that initial gaze stability was established using almost exclusive head-response components with little eye-movement contribution. However, that trend reversed as recovery progressed so that when gaze stability was complete, the eye component had increased and the head response had decreased to levels significantly different from that observed in normal birds. This was true even though the head-fixed VOR response recovered normally. Recovery of gaze stability coincided well with the three stage temporal sequence of morphologic regeneration previously described by our laboratory.