HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 99/2/939    most recent 01225.2007v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (6) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Merchant, H. Articles by Prado, L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Merchant, H. Articles by Prado, L.

Do We Have a Common Mechanism for Measuring Time in the Hundreds of Millisecond Range? Evidence From Multiple-Interval Timing Tasks

Departamento de Neurobiología Conductual y Cognitiva, Instituto de Neurobiología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Campus Juriquilla, Querétaro, Mexico

Submitted 5 November 2007; accepted in final form 17 December 2007

In the present study we examined the performance variability of a group of 13 subjects in eight different tasks that involved the processing of temporal intervals in the subsecond range. These tasks differed in their sensorimotor processing (S; perception vs. production), the modality of the stimuli used to define the intervals (M; auditory vs. visual), and the number of intervals (N; one or four). Different analytical techniques were used to determine the existence of a central or distributed timing mechanism across tasks. The results showed a linear increase in performance variability as a function of the interval duration in all tasks. However, this compliance of the scalar property of interval timing was accompanied by a strong effect of S, N, and M and the interaction between these variables on the subjects' temporal accuracy. Thus the performance variability was larger not only in perceptual tasks than that in motor-timing tasks, but also using visual rather than auditory stimuli, and decreased as a function of the number of intervals. These results suggest the existence of a partially overlapping distributed mechanism underlying the ability to quantify time in different contexts.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. V. Buonomano, J. Bramen, and M. Khodadadifar Influence of the interstimulus interval on temporal processing and learning: testing the state-dependent network model Phil Trans R Soc B, July 12, 2009; 364(1525): 1865 - 1873. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P.A. Lewis and R.C. Miall The precision of temporal judgement: milliseconds, many minutes, and beyond Phil Trans R Soc B, July 12, 2009; 364(1525): 1897 - 1905. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. P. Gavornik, M. G. H. Shuler, Y. Loewenstein, M. F. Bear, and H. Z. Shouval Learning reward timing in cortex through reward dependent expression of synaptic plasticity PNAS, April 21, 2009; 106(16): 6826 - 6831. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]