HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 99/3/1572    most recent 01198.2007v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (10) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Boulinguez, P. Articles by Benraiss, A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Boulinguez, P. Articles by Benraiss, A.

REPORT

Warning Signals Induce Automatic EMG Activations and Proactive Volitional Inhibition: Evidence From Analysis of Error Distribution in Simple RT

¹Université de Poitiers, Centre de Recherches sur la Cognition et l'Apprentissage, Équipe Attention et Contrôle, Unité Mixte de Recherche du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (UMR CNRS) 6234; ²Université de Poitiers, Laboratoire Performance Motricité et Cognition, Equipe d'Accueil 3814; and ³Université de Poitiers, Laboratoire Langage Mémoire et Développement Cognitif, UMR CNRS 6215, France

Submitted 26 October 2007; accepted in final form 23 December 2007

Typical simple reaction-time (RT) paradigms usually include a warning signal followed by a variable foreperiod before the presentation of a reaction stimulus. Most current interpretations suggest that the warning stimulus alerts the organism and so results in faster processing of either the sensory or motor components of the task. In this study, electromyography (EMG) was used to detect both covert and overt motor errors in a simple warned RT task. Results show that warning signals may trigger automatic motor activations that are likely to cause false alarms. Distribution analysis reveals that 77% of all errors detected with EMG are erroneous responses to the warning signal. Accordingly, we propose that movement triggering needs to be temporarily inhibited before the stimulus to prevent premature responses during the foreperiod. This proactive inhibition would be responsible for a paradoxical increase in RT for conditions with short foreperiods compared with control conditions in which no warning signal is presented. These results call for a reassessment of the theoretical framework used to interpret the effects of warning signals.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B. Ballanger Top-Down Control of Saccades as Part of a Generalized Model of Proactive Inhibitory Control J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2009; 102(5): 2578 - 2580. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. R. Makin, N. P. Holmes, C. Brozzoli, Y. Rossetti, and A. Farne Coding of Visual Space during Motor Preparation: Approaching Objects Rapidly Modulate Corticospinal Excitability in Hand-Centered Coordinates J. Neurosci., September 23, 2009; 29(38): 11841 - 11851. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Duque and R. B. Ivry Role of Corticospinal Suppression during Motor Preparation Cereb Cortex, September 1, 2009; 19(9): 2013 - 2024. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. S. Narayanan and M. Laubach Delay Activity in Rodent Frontal Cortex During a Simple Reaction Time Task J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2009; 101(6): 2859 - 2871. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]