JN Information on EB 2010
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 99: 1983-1987, 2008. First published January 30, 2008; doi:10.1152/jn.00631.2007
0022-3077/08 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
99/4/1983    most recent
00631.2007v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Weigt, H. U.
Right arrow Articles by Föhr, K. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Weigt, H. U.
Right arrow Articles by Föhr, K. J.

REPORT

Evidence That Xenon Does Not Produce Open Channel Blockade of the NMDA Receptor

Henry U. Weigt, Oliver Adolph, Michael Georgieff, Eva M. Georgieff and Karl J. Föhr

Clinic for Anesthesiology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany

Submitted 7 June 2007; accepted in final form 19 January 2008

Previous studies had not excluded the possibility that the mechanism by which Xenon (Xe) blocks N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors might be that of an open-channel blocker. We tested this possibility on mutant NMDA receptors carrying an alanine (A) to cysteine (C) mutation located within the SYTANLAAF-motif of the third transmembrane region (TM3). This mutation was shown to yield constitutively open ion channels after modification with a thiol-modifying reagent. We expressed such mutant channels in Neuro2A cells and recorded glutamate (50 µM)-induced currents in the whole cell recording mode. Although Xe (3.5 mM) blocked the currents through the wild-type receptor NR1-1a/NR2A and NR1-1a/NR2B by ~40% and those through the mutant receptors NR1-1a/NR2A(A650C) or NR1-1a/NR2B(A651C) by ~30%, it was unable to block the currents through the methane thiosulfonate etyhlammonium-modified mutant receptors. On the other hand, established open-channel blockers of the NMDA receptor such as MK-801 (1 µM) or Mg ions (Mg2+; 1 mM) were able to block these permanently open channels. These results suggest that Xe does not act as a classical open-channel blocker at the NMDA receptor.


Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: K. J. Föhr, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Universitätsklinik für Anästhesie, Steinhövelstraβe 9, 89070 Ulm, Germany (E-mail: karl.foehr{at}uniklinik-ulm.de)







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2008 by the The American Physiological Society.