JN Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 99: 2320-2328, 2008. First published February 27, 2008; doi:10.1152/jn.00280.2007 Free Article
0022-3077/08 $8.00
This Article
Free upon publication Free Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Corrected PDF
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
99/5/2320    most recent
00280.2007v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wen, Q.
Right arrow Articles by Chklovskii, D. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wen, Q.
Right arrow Articles by Chklovskii, D. B.

A Cost–Benefit Analysis of Neuronal Morphology

Quan Wen1,2 and Dmitri B. Chklovskii1

1Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor; and 2Department of Physics and Astronomy, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, New York

Submitted 12 March 2007; accepted in final form 24 February 2008

Over hundreds of millions of years, evolution has optimized brain design to maximize its functionality while minimizing costs associated with building and maintenance. This observation suggests that one can use optimization theory to rationalize various features of brain design. Here, we attempt to explain the dimensions and branching structure of dendritic arbors by minimizing dendritic cost for given potential synaptic connectivity. Assuming only that dendritic cost increases with total dendritic length and path length from synapses to soma, we find that branching, planar, and compact dendritic arbors, such as those belonging to Purkinje cells in the cerebellum, are optimal. The theory predicts that adjacent Purkinje dendritic arbors should spatially segregate. In addition, we propose two explicit cost function expressions, falsifiable by measuring dendritic caliber near bifurcations.


Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: D. B. Chklovskii, Janelia Farm Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, 19700 Helix Drive, Ashburn VA 20147 (E-mail: chklovskiid{at}janelia.hhmi.org)




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
M. Kaiser, C. C. Hilgetag, and A. van Ooyen
A Simple Rule for Axon Outgrowth and Synaptic Competition Generates Realistic Connection Lengths and Filling Fractions
Cereb Cortex, December 1, 2009; 19(12): 3001 - 3010.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
Q. Wen, A. Stepanyants, G. N. Elston, A. Y. Grosberg, and D. B. Chklovskii
Maximization of the connectivity repertoire as a statistical principle governing the shapes of dendritic arbors
PNAS, July 28, 2009; 106(30): 12536 - 12541.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2008 by the The American Physiological Society.