JN Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Neurophysiol 99: 3063-3074, 2008. First published April 24, 2008; doi:10.1152/jn.90259.2008
0022-3077/08 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
99/6/3063    most recent
90259.2008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (7)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goble, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Brown, S. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Goble, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Brown, S. H.

Upper Limb Asymmetries in the Matching of Proprioceptive Versus Visual Targets

Daniel J. Goble and Susan H. Brown

Division of Kinesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan

Submitted 11 February 2008; accepted in final form 15 April 2008

The purpose of the current study was to determine the extent to which "sensory dominance" exists in right-handers with respect to the utilization of proprioceptive versus visual feedback. Thirteen right-handed adults performed two target-matching tasks using instrumented manipulanda. In the proprioceptive matching task, the left or right elbow of blindfolded subjects was passively extended by a torque motor system to a target position and held for 3 s before being returned to the start position. The target angle was then matched with either the ipsilateral or contralateral arm. In the second task, visual matching, circular targets were briefly projected to either side of a visual fixation point located in front of the subject. Subjects then matched the target positions with a laser pointer by moving either the ipsilateral or contralateral arm. Overall, marked arm differences in accuracy were seen based on the type of sensory feedback used for target presentation. For the proprioceptive matching task errors were smaller for the nonpreferred left arm, whereas during the visual matching task smaller errors were found for the preferred right arm. These results suggest a left arm/right hemisphere advantage for proprioceptive feedback processing and a right arm/left hemisphere advantage for visual information processing. Such asymmetries may reflect fundamental differences between the two arm/hemisphere systems during the performance of bimanual tasks where the preferred arm requires visual guidance to manipulate an object, whereas the nonpreferred stabilizes that object on the basis of proprioceptive feedback.


Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: S. H. Brown, University of Michigan, Division of Kinesiology, 1402 Washington Heights, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2013 (E-mail: shcb{at}umich.edu)




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
I. Derakhshan
Directionality of Callosal Traffic Determines Laterality of Motor Control
J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2008; 100(6): 3458 - 3458.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
D. J. Goble and S. H. Brown
Reply to Dr. Derakhshan
J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2008; 100(6): 3459 - 3459.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2008 by the The American Physiological Society.