Skip to main content
  • Other Journals from APS
    • AJP-Cell
    • AJP-Endo
    • AJP-GI
    • AJP-Heart
    • AJP-Lung
    • AJP-Regu
    • AJP-Renal
    • AJP-Legacy
    • Physiology
    • Advances
    • JAPPL
    • JN
    • PG
    • PRV
    • COMP PHYS
    • PHYSIOL REP
    • APS Select
    • www.physiology.org

Login

 
Journal of Neurophysiology

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Articles In Press
    • Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • About
    • Article Types
    • Neuro Forum Guidelines
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Patients
    • Advertisers
    • Media
    • News
  • EDITORS
    • Newsletter
    • Editor's Message
    • Editor's Bio
    • Editorial Board
  • SUBSCRIBE
    • Subscribe
  • SUBMIT
    • Submit a Manuscript

Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor α7 and α4β2 Subtypes Differentially Control GABAergic Input to CA1 Neurons in Rat Hippocampus

Manickavasagom Alkondon, Edson X. Albuquerque
Journal of Neurophysiology Published 1 December 2001 Vol. 86 no. 6, 3043-3055 DOI:
Manickavasagom Alkondon
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • View author's works on this site
Edson X. Albuquerque
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • View author's works on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • E-letters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig. 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    U-tube configuration and photomicrographs of CA1 neurons in rat hippocampal slices. A: schematic diagram showing the configuration of a U-tube in relation to a pyramidal neuron. The largest diameter for the U-tube pore is ∼250 μm. The valve closure results in a linear flow of agonist solution through the U-tube pore driven by gravity. However, the external bath superfusion changes the agonist flow in the direction shown by the dashed lines.B–F: photomicrographs of images of biocytin-filled CA1 neurons in fixed hippocampal slices: pyramidal neuron (B), stratum oriens (SO) interneuron (C), s. pyramidal (SP) interneuron (D), s. radiatum (SR) interneuron (E), and s. lacunosum moleculare (SLM) interneuron (F). a refers to axonal branching. Calibration bar in the images = 150 μm.

  • Fig. 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2.

    Efficacy of choline and ACh in inducing GABAergic postsynaptic currents (PSCs) in CA1 pyramidal neurons of rat hippocampal slices.A: sample neurolucida drawing of an image of a biocytin-filled CA1 pyramidal neuron from which GABAergic PSCs were recorded. Dendrites are drawn as thick lines (for simplicity, uniform thickness was applied to all dendritic branches) and axon as thin lines. B–E: sample tracings of agonist-induced GABAergic PSCs recorded under whole cell patch-clamp mode at 0 mV from 4 pyramidal neurons are shown. GABAergic PSCs were outward currents under the present experimental conditions. Choline (10 mM) or ACh (1 mM) was applied for 12 s as indicated by solid lines at thebottom of each trace. Agonists were applied to the surface of the neurons, covering cell somata and dendrites, by a stream of solution flowing through a U-tube with a pore of 250 μm. Note that summation of individual PSCs resulted in large tonic outward currents, summation being more pronounced in ACh than in choline. InB, exposure of the slice to bicuculline (10 μM) for 5–10 min decreased the spontaneous and agonist-induced PSCs. InC, exposure of the slice to methyllycaconitine (MLA, 10 nM) for 10 min completely abolished the effect of choline and exposure to dihydro-β-erythroidine (DHβE, 10 μM) abolished large portion of ACh-induced PSCs. In D, exposure of the slice to a combination of 6-cyano-7-nitroquinoxalene-2,3-dione (CNQX, 10 μM) and 2-amino-5-phosphonovaleric acid (APV, 20 μM) for 10 min had minimal inhibitory effect on choline-induced PSCs. In E,exposure of the slice to TTX (0.5 μM) markedly decreased the frequency of ACh-induced PSCs. F: scatter plot shows the distribution of net charge values for each agonist calculated for individual neurons (n = 12). Note that in this and in subsequent figures, there is superimposition of the symbols when the individual values are near to each other.

  • Fig. 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3.

    Efficacy of choline and ACh in inducing GABAergic PSCs in CA1 SO interneurons of rat hippocampal slices. A–C: sample neurolucida drawings of images of 3 biocytin-filled CA1 SO interneurons from which GABAergic PSCs were recorded. All 3 neurons had horizontally oriented dendrites of different lengths, but their axons had a tendency to terminate either in the SO (left) or SLM (middle and right). D–F: sample tracings of GABAergic PSCs recorded from the interneurons shown at the top and the effects of choline and ACh. Note that the agonist-induced PSCs remained isolated for the most part and that choline failed to increase the frequency of GABAergic PSCs in themiddle and right neurons. G: scatter plot shows the distribution of net charge values for each agonist calculated for individual neurons.

  • Fig. 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 4.

    Efficacy of choline and ACh in inducing GABAergic PSCs in CA1 SP interneurons of rat hippocampal slices. A andB: sample neurolucida drawings of images of 2 biocytin-filled CA1 SP interneurons from which GABAergic PSCs were recorded. The interneurons had several dendrites emerging from the cell somata that traversed through the SR into the SLM. Axonal branches were clustered in the SP layer. C and D: sample tracings of GABAergic PSCs recorded from the interneurons shown above. E: scatter plot shows the distribution of net charge values for each agonist calculated for individual neurons.

  • Fig. 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 5.

    Efficacy of choline and ACh in inducing GABAergic PSCs in CA1 SR interneurons of rat hippocampal slices. A andB: sample neurolucida drawings of images of 2 biocytin-filled CA1 SR interneurons from which GABAergic PSCs were recorded. The dendrites were extended either to the SR and SO (A) or to SR only (B), whereas axon branching was restricted to SR. C and D: sample tracings of GABAergic PSCs recorded from the interneurons shown at the top and the effects of choline and ACh. Note that summation of individual PSCs resulted in large tonic outward currents, the summation being more pronounced in ACh than in choline.E: scatter plot shows the distribution of net charge values for each agonist calculated for individual neurons.

  • Fig. 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 6.

    Efficacy of choline and ACh in inducing GABAergic PSCs in CA1 SLM interneurons of rat hippocampal slices. A andB: sample neurolucida drawings of images of 2 biocytin-filled CA1 SLM interneurons from which GABAergic PSCs were recorded. The dendrites were located in the SLM only (A) or to SLM and SR (B). The axon terminated either in the SLM (A) or in various layers (B).C and D: sample tracings of GABAergic PSCs and the effect of choline and ACh recorded from the respective interneurons shown at the top. Note that ACh and choline both produced PSCs that summated to form a large tonic outward current.E: scatter plot shows the distribution of net charge values for each agonist calculated for individual neurons.

  • Fig. 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 7.

    Comparison of the net charge of GABAergic PSCs induced by choline and ACh in pyramidal neurons and interneurons of the CA1 region.A: the net charge flowing through GABAAreceptors during a 12-s application of choline (representing the magnitude of α7 nAChR activation) and ACh (representing the magnitude of α7 and α4β2 nAChR activation combined) was calculated and plotted as the mean ± SE for each neuron type. To assess the contribution of α4β2 nAChRs alone, we subtracted the net charge induced by choline from that induced by ACh and plotted it separately in B. The neuron sample size was 12 in the stratum pyramidal pyramidal neuron (SPP), 8 in SO, 7 in SPI, 12 in SR, and 10 in SLM. The magnitude of choline-induced PSCs in A is significantly different between various neuron groups by Dunnett's multiple comparison test: SPP vs. SO (P < 0.01); SPP vs. SPI (P < 0.05); SO vs. SLM (P < 0.001); SPI vs. SLM (P < 0.001); SR vs. SLM (P < 0.01). The magnitude of ACh-induced PSCs in A is significantly different between various groups by Dunnett's multiple comparison test: SPP vs. SO (P < 0.05); SPP vs. SPI (P < 0.01); SO vs. SLM (P < 0.01); SPI vs. SLM (P < 0.001). In A, the mean values for ACh are significantly different (P < 0.01 byt-test) from those for choline in SPP, SR, and SLM. InB, the mean value for SPI is significantly lower than that in SPP (P < 0.001), SR (P< 0.05), and SLM (P < 0.05) by Dunnett's multiple comparison test.

  • Fig. 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 8.

    Focal application of ACh triggers GABAergic PSCs in SR interneurons.A: continuous recording of GABAergic PSCs from an SR interneuron. ACh (1 mM) was pressure-ejected (●) close to the cell somata for 25 ms (1st 2 pulses) or 50 ms (3rd and 4th pulse).B: trace shows sample of spontaneous GABAergic PSCs.C: trace (corresponding to the 4th pulse inA) showing the PSCs induced by 50 ms pulse of ACh.D: trace showing the effect of a 50-ms pulse of ACh after exposure of the slice for 2 min to 0.5 μM TTX. Calibration bar applies to traces in B, C, and D. E: plot of the distribution of the events from the trace shown in A.

  • Fig. 9.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 9.

    A low concentration of ACh induces GABAergic PSCs but does not evoke action potentials. A, top: a cell-attached recording from a SR interneuron shows action currents in response to U-tube applied choline. Pipette potential = −60 mV.Bottom: a whole cell recording from the same neuron in which application of a similar pulse of choline evokes nicotinic inward current. Holding potential = −68 mV. Vertical calibration: 25 pA for top trace and 50 pA for bottom trace. B, top: a cell-attached recording in which U-tube applied ACh (10 μM) failed to evoke action currents.Bottom: a whole cell current recording from the same neuron at 0 mV and reveals that same pulse of ACh triggers a burst of GABAergic PSCs. C: cumulative distribution plots of GABAergic PSCs under control conditions and during a 5-min bath exposure to ACh (10 μM) in another SR interneuron. ACh-induced changes in the distribution of the amplitudes and interevent intervals were found to be statistically significant (P < 0.001 by Kolmogorov-Smirnov analysis).

  • Fig. 10.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 10.

    Schematic representation of hippocampal CA1 neurocircuitry showing the impact of nAChR-mediated GABAergic inhibition. One pyramidal neuron (P) and 4 interneurons (I) in different laminae are shown. Excitatory glutamatergic afferents (blue lines) and inhibitory GABAergic afferents (red lines) are shown. The prevalent nAChR subtypes expressed on the somatodendritic region of the interneurons are indicated near each neuron. The strength of inhibition exerted onto each category of neurons arising from nAChR-mediated GABA release is shown on an arbitrary scale of 1+ to 5+, with 1+ representing a low-level inhibition and 5+ a high-level inhibition.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Table 1.

    ACh/choline ratio in inducing GABAergic PSCs

    ParameterSPPSOSPISRSLM
    Mean4.20 ± 0.674.04 ± 0.641.36 ± 0.354.40 ± 0.601.83 ± 0.17
    Range1.9–9.62.1–5.60.7–3.11.3–7.41.0–2.6
    n 12561210
    P* <0.01<0.05>0.05<0.01>0.05
    • ↵*  Data were compared to a hypothetical mean ratio of 2.0 for significance using the one-sample t-test. An ACh/choline ratio of 2.0 would be expected if there was equal contribution from α7 and α4β2 nicotinic ACh receptors (nAChRs) in ACh-induced postsynaptic currents (PSCs). SPP, stratum pyramidal pyramidal neuron; SO, stratum oriens; SPI, s. pyramidal interneuron; SR, s. radiatum; SLM, s. lacunosum moleculare.

PreviousNext
Back to top
View this article with LENS
What is LENS?
About the Cover

About the Cover

Cover image

Cover image expansion

Cover: Multiregional Brain-on-a-Chip in vitro model. Neurons (green) from different brain regions (here prefrontal cortex, left, and amygdala, right) are restricted to distinct areas, but are connecting controllably to the other brain region through axons which are guided by microcontact printed lines. This is a zoom in image from the entire brain-on-a-chip model, which consists of three brain regions. This multiregional brain-on-a-chip is electrically active and reacts to drug applications in a brain region dependent way. Astrocytes are labelled in red. The smallest distance between the different brain areas is 1 mm. From Dauth S, Maoz BM, Sheehy SP, Hemphill MA, Murty T, Macedonia MK, Greer AM, Budnik B, Parker KK. Neurons derived from different brain regions are inherently different in vitro: a novel multiregional brain-on-a-chip. J Neurophysiol 117: 1320 –1341, 2017; doi:10.1152/jn.00575.2016.

  • Table of Contents
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • E-letters
  • PDF
Alert me when this article is cited
Alert me if a correction is posted
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Neurophysiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor α7 and α4β2 Subtypes Differentially Control GABAergic Input to CA1 Neurons in Rat Hippocampus
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Neurophysiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Neurophysiology web site.
Print
Citation Tools
Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor α7 and α4β2 Subtypes Differentially Control GABAergic Input to CA1 Neurons in Rat Hippocampus
Manickavasagom Alkondon, Edson X. Albuquerque
Journal of Neurophysiology Dec 2001, 86 (6) 3043-3055;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor α7 and α4β2 Subtypes Differentially Control GABAergic Input to CA1 Neurons in Rat Hippocampus
Manickavasagom Alkondon, Edson X. Albuquerque
Journal of Neurophysiology Dec 2001, 86 (6) 3043-3055;
Permalink:
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo

View Full Page PDF

  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Reddit logo Reddit
  • CiteULike logo CiteULike
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley
  • StumbleUpon logo StumbleUpon

More in this TOC Section

  • Integration of motion energy from overlapping random background noise increases perceived speed of coherently moving stimuli
  • The response of the vestibulosympathetic reflex to linear acceleration in the rat
  • Emergence of band-pass filtering through adaptive spiking in the owl's cochlear nucleus
Show more ARTICLE

Related Articles

Cited By...

  • Most Read
  • Most Cited
Loading
  • Nonlinearity of two-photon Ca2+ imaging yields distorted measurements of tuning for V1 neuronal populations
  • Theories of pain: from specificity to gate control
  • Reward, Addiction, and Emotion Regulation Systems Associated With Rejection in Love
  • The organization of the human cerebral cortex estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity
  • Reward, Motivation, and Emotion Systems Associated With Early-Stage Intense Romantic Love
More...

Navigate

  • Current Issue
  • Articles in Press
  • Archives
  • Feedback
  • Submit
  • Subscribe
  • Personal Alerts

More Information

  • About this Journal
  • Information for Authors
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Press
  • Advertising
  • AuthorChoice
  • Calls for Papers
  • Ethics Policy
  • PubMed Central Policy
  • Reprints and Permissions
  • Institutional Administrators
  • APS Publications News
  • Follow APS Publications on Twitter

American Physiological Society Journals

  • Cell Physiology
  • Advances in Physiology Education
  • Comprehensive Physiology
  • Endocrinology and Metabolism
  • Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology
  • Heart and Circulatory Physiology
  • Journal of Applied Physiology
  • Journal of Neurophysiology
  • Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology
  • Physiological Genomics
  • Physiological Reviews
  • Physiology
  • Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology
  • Renal Physiology
  • Physiological Reports
  • Legacy Content
  • APS Select
  • www.physiology.org

Copyright © 2017 The American Physiological Society | Print ISSN: 0022-3077 | Online ISSN: 1522-1598